Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°­¿øµµ ÀϺΠ³ëÀο¡¼­ÀÇ ³ëÀα¸°­°Ç°­Æò°¡Áö¼ö(GOHAI)ÀÇ Å¸´ç µµ¿Í ½Å·Úµµ

A Korean version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in elderly populations: validity and reliability

´ëÇѱ¸°­º¸°ÇÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 35±Ç 2È£ p.187 ~ 195
½Å¼±Á¤, Á¤¼¼È¯,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
½Å¼±Á¤ ( Shin Sun-Jung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ¿øÁÖÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡À§»ýÇаú
Á¤¼¼È¯ ( Jung Se-Hwan ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÄ¡Çб³½Ç ¹× ±¸°­°úÇבּ¸¼Ò

Abstract


Objective: This study was aimed to develop a Korean version of the GOHAI for elderly people.

Methods: The GOHAI for elderly people was cross-culturally adapted from English into Korean and then the derived instrument was tested for reliability and validity. The study population consisted of elderly (65£« year-old) residents of Wonju-City, South Korea. Five elderly welfare institutions were selected.

Results: 615 people were invited and 155 participated in the study (response rate: 25.2%). The standardized Cronbach¡¯s alpha coefficient was 0.834. Kappa value for the test-retest was 0.482. Participants who responded that they had perceived needs for dental treatment had much lower GOHAI scores than those who did not have a perceived need for treatments (p£¼0.001). The results from perceived oral health conditions and perceived general health conditions exhibited similar responses; people who considered their oral or general conditions were good had significantly higher GOHAI scores (p£¼0.01).

Conclusion: The Korean version of GOHAI was appropriate to measure the OHRQoL of older Korean people. Longitudinal studies are needed to test the sensitivity of this index.

Å°¿öµå

±¸°­°Ç°­°ü·Ã »îÀÇ Áú; ³ëÀα¸°­°Ç°­Æò°¡Áö¼ö; ½Å·Úµµ; Ÿ´çµµ
GOHAI; OHRQoL; reliability; validity

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed